![]() No casino should want to have a vacant building across from one of its main entrances – not to mention what it means to the overall development of downtown Springfield. The extension could eventually reach 2020, as approved by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. Reason Number 4 is the request for yet another delay in the renovation of the long vacant Elm Street block, which would create 54 units of market-rate housing in a proposed $40 million mixed-use development. No money for Springfield, but $750 million for Bridgeport?īy the way, MGM did have a presence in Connecticut when they teamed with Foxwoods in 2006, only to pull out of the deal in 2013. Reason Number 3 came last year when MGM sought a commercial casino license in Bridgeport, Connecticut, at a cost of $750 million.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |